Writing a peer review that is firm without being nasty

Popularity Index: 2 Updated at 2026-10-11 09:20 UTC

Sites

Related Topics

Reviewers picked for prestige rather than expertise in the exact method Should early career researchers review papers at all? Getting a paper to review that sits outside your field by one step Single-blind vs double-blind review: does hiding author names change who gets in? A reviewer identified themselves to the author in a small field Reviewing a revised manuscript: do you re-read the whole thing? Why reviewers disagree so violently on the same manuscript How long should a referee report take to write? When it is fair to recommend rejection rather than major revision The unwritten rule against reviewing a direct competitor's grant

Hot Categories

Featured Categories