The seventeen-year gap from evidence to practice and why that number is contested

Popularity Index: 0 Updated at 2026-10-11 14:38 UTC

Sites

Related Topics

Policy citations in government documents count as impact even when the policy was rejected A guideline update takes five years and the evidence changed in year two Writing an impact case study for a mathematics paper that nobody outside the field reads A practitioner toolkit is invisible in academic metrics because practitioners do not cite Download counts and altmetrics measure attention rather than use A two-page policy brief forces a decision about which caveat to drop Altmetrics capture attention and attention is not the same thing as use Citation counts measure a field's citation habits more than a paper's contribution The REF asks for impact case studies and every department writes the same one about a clinical guideline Assessing impact five years after publication punishes the work that takes longest

Hot Categories

Featured Categories