Is it worth citing a paper everyone knows is flawed

Popularity Index: 0 Updated at 2026-10-11 09:20 UTC

Sites

Related Topics

Why some classic papers are wrong and still get cited Paleography is the unglamorous skill behind every claim about Arabic astronomy Why was the discovery of nuclear fission credited to Hahn and not to Lise Meitner What historians of science actually do with a dead scientist's laboratory notebooks Do fraud findings end a scientific career or just move it to another institution? How a field polices its own members and when that fails Revolutionary claims get judged partly on how the next textbook tells the story Whistleblowing on a lab mate: what actually happens to the person who reports How does a research library organise its shelves around the branches of science? What separates fabrication from sloppy data handling in a misconduct finding?

Hot Categories

Featured Categories