Reviewers asking for a replication before they will accept a surprising claim

Popularity Index: 3 Updated at 2026-10-11 09:20 UTC

Sites

Related Topics

Should journals publish failed replications of papers they already published? When an original author will not share the protocol you asked for Why does peer review take four months when reviewers were asked for two weeks? Single-blind vs double-blind review: does hiding author names change who gets in? Does publishing the referee reports alongside the paper change referee behavior? Editors accepting a paper against both referee recommendations Reviewing a revised manuscript: do you re-read the whole thing? A replication that failed because the original paper described the method vaguely What the editor decides alone before a paper ever reaches a reviewer The retraction notice that never says why the paper was pulled

Hot Categories

Featured Categories