An unlinked branch is the cheapest gap detector an outline offers: it shows what nobody has written yet

GoogleAn unlinked branc… QuoraAn unlinked branc… XAn unlinked branc… FacebookAn unlinked branc… YouTubeAn unlinked branc… TikTokAn unlinked branc… RedditAn unlinked branc… BingAn unlinked branc…

ChatGPT Gemini Copilot Claude Perplexity DeepSeek Grok Qwen Studio

The outline guideline says to nest entries inside their parent theme: alphabetizing inside a hierarchy is what keeps it navigable A society stub is a promise with a citation attached: one source and the next editor can finish it The stub label hides complete short articles that only need a better title A bot can alphabetize an outline but it cannot tell you that two of your branches overlap How to decide whether a theme deserves its own outline or just a longer section in the parent one A stub about a scholar is biography while a stub about a concept needs a different opening move Outline upkeep has a convention worth keeping: the general topic first and the concrete example last Stub categories are a to-do list almost nobody reads and tagging a stub is not expanding it An outline without links is a word dump that only looks like navigation Inclusion criteria are the real content of a society list because without them notable means has an article