Analytic philosophy - Topics

Why does analytic philosophy treat one counterexample as enough to sink a definition? What separates analytic from continental philosophy once you ignore which continent the department sits on? Why did analytic philosophy give up grand systems for the piecemeal analysis of single arguments? What the quarrel between emotivism and prescriptivism turned on Does analytic philosophy have a canon the way continental philosophy does? Did analytic philosophy lose its public when it stopped writing for anyone outside the seminar room? Did the linguistic turn sharpen analytic philosophy or trap it in puzzles about words? Why does continental philosophy keep Hegel in the room when analytic philosophy left him behind? What does continental philosophy do with a text that analytic philosophy would only call unclear? Can analytic philosophy explain consciousness without quietly borrowing from phenomenology? What survived of the Vienna Circle's verificationism after analytic philosophy dropped it? What did ordinary language philosophy gain by refusing to regiment how people actually speak? Why does analytic philosophy treat clear writing as a moral duty? Is continental philosophy a tradition or a set of reading habits shared across national departments? Is continental philosophy's hostility to naturalism a position or a temperament? How did Frege and Russell turn symbolic logic into the working tool of a whole tradition? Why do analytic philosophers translate ordinary claims into formal notation before trusting them? Is the analytic-continental divide still a real disagreement or only a hiring convention?