Moral judgment - Category Home
Moral judgment - Topics
When does a jury reach better verdicts than a judge alone?
The trolley problem as a teaching tool: what it teaches and what it hides
What separates a moral advisor from someone who is merely good at arguing
Why the same act can be honest in one setting and cruel in another
The same practice can be condemned as cruelty in one society and honored as duty in another
Can gut feelings about right and wrong be trusted?
Chimpanzee politics show strategic deception without moral judgment
Moral judgment in a courtroom must be unanimous and public unlike the private verdicts we pass daily
Contempt as a moral emotion and its role in dividing groups
Why anger at injustice can be useful and also destructive
Who answers for the harm when an algorithm makes the decision?
How juries decide guilt and how that differs from moral judgment
Why children hide wrongdoing long before they can explain why it was wrong
The flash of disgust that decides a moral verdict before thought begins
At what age do children understand that a lie can be told to protect someone?
Common logical fallacies in everyday moral arguments
Why people judge the same act differently once they know the person's story
Should you be blamed for harm you did not intend and could not foresee?
Analogical reasoning in ethics: arguing from one case to another
Why hindsight makes other people's choices look obviously wrong
Why some adults never move past black-and-white moral thinking
Do we judge strangers more harshly than friends for the same act?
The halo effect: why likable people get judged more leniently
"He has no morals" and "that was immoral" are two different accusations
Why you can tell something is wrong before you can say why
Why some people seem to have no conscience at all
Weighing competing considerations when no principle covers the case
Trolley problems and the difference between pushing and switching
Milgram showed how quickly moral judgment bends toward whoever holds the authority
Outcome bias: blaming people for bad luck rather than bad intent
Why motivated reasoning makes people defend conclusions they already hold
Why the hardest ethical decisions are the ones with no villain in them